S’Court chooses Govs Udom, Ikpeazu, Ishaku’s destiny today


 


S'Court chooses Govs Udom, Ikpeazu, Ishaku's destiny today
S’Court chooses Govs Udom, Ikpeazu, Ishaku’s destiny today

The Supreme Court will today hear and decide the three pending requests before it over governorship decision petitions that emerged from the April 11 surveys.


The peak court will be conveying its judgment on the offer of the legislative leader of Abia state, Okezie Ikpeazu of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP testing the choice of the Court of Appeal Owerri division that invalidated his race and pronounced Alex Otti of APGA victor of the governorship surveys.


Additionally, Minister of Women Affairs, Senator Aisha Alhassan of All Progressive Congress, APC is under the watchful eye of the peak court testing the choice of the Court of Appeal that upturned the choice of the tribunal sitting in Abuja that pronounced her the properly chose legislative leader of Taraba state, sending the occupant representative Darius Ishaku pressing.


Likewise, the court will today settle the Akwa Ibom governorship question between representative Udom Emmanuel of PDP and his nearest adversary, Umana of the APC.


Akwa Ibom State representative, Udom Emmanuel had tested the invalidation of his decision by the Court of Appeal which in Abuja requested a new race in all the lo¬cal government zones of the state.


The Appeal Court drop the whole April 11, 2015 governorship decision that created Governor Em¬manuel of the Peoples Democratic Par¬ty by virtue of gross abnormalities in the race.


Hence, the court in an unani¬mous judgment requested that a new race be led inside of 90 days in consistence with the Electoral Act 2010.


Conveying judgment in a bid documented by the governorship hopeful of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Umana Okon Umana, the redrafting court put aside the judgment of the State Election Petition Tribunal conveyed Oc¬tober 21, which invalidated the decision in 18 out of the 31 neighborhood government ranges of the state.


A board of five judges of the Court of Appeal, drove by Justice Oludotun-Okojie held that, having built up that the abnormalities in the race were all inclusive, the tribunal should not to have saved the remaining 13 neighborhood government territories.


The redrafting court judges held that the proof from all gatherings demonstrated that there was no examination amid the indicated decision and all things considered, elec¬tion can’t be said to have been con¬ducted under that circumstances.


Jutice Oludotun-Okojie additionally said that the non-generous consistence with the Electoral Act in the behavior of the race, qualified the lower tribu¬nal for have invalidated the whole race held in the state.


By court, there was no question that the votes cast on the elec¬tion day surpassed the quantity of ac¬credited voters for the decision, including additionally that even with the misbehaviors, Governor Emmanuel couldn’t have been said to have scored most of the legal votes cast.


By, while 437, 128 voters were licensed for the elec¬tion, more than 1, 222, 885 votes were said to have been thrown, demonstrating an abundance of 685, 780 votes authorize for the survey.


From straightforward number juggling, nobody needs a diviner to presume that there was over voting in the whole elec¬tion in the state.


The APC governorship applicant, Umana Okon Umana had requested against the judgment of the state gov¬ernorship decision appeal tribunal, which on October 21 wiped out the survey in 18 LGAs and maintained race in the remaining 13 nearby government zones in the state.


In the claim contended by his legal advisor, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, Uma¬na asked the court for cancelation of the whole race, in perspective of the fail¬ure of the Independent National Elec¬toral Commission, INEC, to agree to the Electoral Act and rules for the decision.


He said INEC’S archive demonstrating the over voting was not debated by any of the gatherings in the matter.


Perused ALSO Don’t undermine appointive procedure – Balarabe Musa cautions


Maintains Govs Gaidam, Ajimobi, Okowa’s races


In the interim, the Court yesterday said Senator Abiola Ajimobi was properly chosen Governor of Oyo State in the April 11, 2015 governorship decision held in the state.


The summit court, in a consistent judgment of a seven-part board of judges headed by Justice Walter Onnoghen, rejected the claim by Rasheed Ladoja of Accord Party, AP, testing Ajimobi’s triumph in the race led by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.


Equity Clara Binta Ogunbiyi, who conveyed the judgment, held that Ladoja’s allure under the steady gaze of the court needed legitimacy and constituted gross misuse of court procedure.


She additionally held that purposes behind the choice of the court will be given on Monday February 15, 2016.


In the same vein, the zenith court likewise maintained the race of Governor Ifeanyi Okowa of Delta State on the stage of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.


Equity John Inyang Okoro held that the bid recorded by Chief Great Ogboru of Labor Party and the governorship applicant of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Olorogun O’tega Emerhor needed legitimacy and was in like manner rejected.


Thus, in a judgment conveyed yesterday, the court held that Alhaji Ibrahim Gaidam was legitimately chosen legislative leader of Yobe State.


The judgment conveyed by Justice Mary Peter Odili held that the request testing Gaidam’s decision brought in the witness of the court by Adamu Maina Waziri of the PDP needed legitimacy and was likewise released.


The court held purposes behind every one of the judgments on Monday, February 15



S'Court chooses Govs Udom, Ikpeazu, Ishaku's destiny today

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Comments system

Disqus Shortname

 
Top